Faculty Profile

Lewis Sykalski

Title
Adjunct Faculty
Department
Computer Science and Engineering
College
College of Engineering

    

Education

DENG, Southern Methodist University, 2015.
Major: Software Engineering
Dissertation Title: A Reusable Framework for Security Dataset Analysis
MS, Southern Methodist University, 2009.
Major: Software Engineering
BS, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2002.
Major: Electrical Engineering

Current Scheduled Teaching*

No current or future courses scheduled.

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

CSCE 3444.400, Software Engineering, Spring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
CSCE 5430.009, Software Engineering, Fall 2023 SPOT
CSCE 3444.003, Software Engineering, Spring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
CSCE 3444.002, Software Engineering, Fall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
CSCE 3444.001, Software Engineering, Spring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
CSCE 3444.002, Software Engineering, Fall 2021 Syllabus SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Publications

Published Intellectual Contributions

Abstracts and Proceedings
Sykalski, L. (2015). Dissertation.
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE