UNT | University of North Texas

Main menu

Maristella Feustle

Title
Associate Librarian
Department
Libraries
College
University of North Texas

Education

MS, University of North Texas, 2010.
Major: Library Science
MM, University of North Texas, 2009.
Major: Jazz Studies
MM, Bowling Green State University, 2005.
Major: Music Theory
Dissertation Title: Neo-Riemannian theory and post-bop jazz : applications of an expanded analytical framework for seventh chords / Maristella Feustle
BA, University of Toledo, 2003.
Major: Mathematics
Degree Specialization: Applied Mathematics for the Natural Sciences
BM, University of Toledo, 2003.
Major: Instrumental Jazz

Current Scheduled Teaching*

INFO 5367.001, Music Libraries and Information Services, Spring 1 2019

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

INFO 5367.001, Music Libraries and Information Services, Spring 2018
INFO 5367.001, Music Libraries and Information Services, Spring 2017

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
1
Challenge and
Engagement Index
2
Response Rate
0
out of 5
0
out of 7
%
of
students responded
A Challenge and Engagement Index of "n/a" means
there were not enough student responses to calculate a score.
  • 1 Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • 2 Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE