Faculty Profile

Muthukudage Kumara

Title
Adjunct Faculty
Department
Computer Science and Engineering
College
College of Engineering

    

Education

PhD, University of North Texas, 2013.
Major: Computer Science and Engineering
Dissertation Title: Automated Real-time Objects Detection in Colonoscopy Videos for Quality Measurements
MS, University of North Texas, 2012.
Major: Computer Science

Current Scheduled Teaching*

No current or future courses scheduled.

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

CSCE 3110.001, Data Structures and Algorithms, Spring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
CSCE 5300.002, Introduction to Big Data and Data Science, Spring 2024 SPOT
CSCE 5290.005, Natural Language Processing, Fall 2023 SPOT
CSCE 5430.010, Software Engineering, Fall 2023 SPOT
CSCE 5390.001, Multimedia Computing, Summer 10W 2023 SPOT
CSCE 5430.001, Software Engineering, Spring 2023 SPOT
CSCE 5465.002, Usability Testing in Software Engineering, Spring 2023 SPOT
CSCE 5200.003, Information Retrieval and Web Search, Fall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
CSCE 5430.005, Software Engineering, Fall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
CSCE 5390.001, Multimedia Computing, Summer 10W 2022
CSCE 5390.002, Multimedia Computing, Summer 8W2 2022
CSCE 5350.002, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fall 2021

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE