Faculty Profile

Oliviero Andreussi

Title
Assistant Professor
Department
Physics
College
College of Science

    

Education

PhD, Scuola Normale Superiore of Pisa, 2008.
Major: Chemical Physics
Dissertation Title: Water at Interfaces
Laurea, University of Pisa, 2003.
Major: Chemistry
Degree Specialization: Chemical Physics
Dissertation Title: Radiative and non-radiative decay rates of molecular excited states close to metal nanoparticles
MS, Scuola Normale Superiore of Pisa, 2003.
Major: Chemistry
Dissertation Title: Radiative and non-radiative decay rates close to complex metal aggregates

Current Scheduled Teaching*

No current or future courses scheduled.

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

PHYS 6940.763, Individual Research, Spring 2019
PHYS 1710.003, Mechanics, Spring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
PHYS 1710.207, Mechanics, Spring 2019 SPOT
PHYS 6940.775, Individual Research, Fall 2018
PHYS 1710.004, Mechanics, Fall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
PHYS 1710.216, Mechanics, Fall 2018
PHYS 1710.217, Mechanics, Fall 2018
PHYS 1710.218, Mechanics, Fall 2018
PHYS 1710.219, Mechanics, Fall 2018
PHYS 1710.220, Mechanics, Fall 2018
PHYS 5910.775, Special Problems, Fall 2018

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE