Faculty Profile

Ramakrishna Koganti

Title
Adjunct Faculty
Department
Mechanical and Energy Engineering
College
College of Engineering

    

Education

MS, Eastern Michigan University, 1997.
Major: Industrial Technology
Concordia University, 1993.
Major: Mechanical Engineering
BE, Gulbarga University, 1988.
Major: Mechanical Engineering

Current Scheduled Teaching*

MEEN 5800.009, Selected Topics of Contemporary Interest in Mechanical Engineering, Fall 2019 Syllabus
MEEN 4800.009, Topics in Mechanical & Energy Engineering, Fall 2019 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

MEEN 5800.009, Selected Topics of Contemporary Interest in Mechanical Engineering, Fall 2018 SPOT
MEEN 5800.609, Selected Topics of Contemporary Interest in Mechanical Engineering, Fall 2018 SPOT
MEEN 4800.009, Topics in Mechanical & Energy Engineering, Fall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
MEEN 5800.009, Selected Topics of Contemporary Interest in Mechanical Engineering, Fall 2017 SPOT
MEEN 4800.009, Topics in Mechanical & Energy Engineering, Fall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
MEEN 5800.009, Selected Topics of Contemporary Interest in Mechanical Engineering, Fall 2016 SPOT
MEEN 4800.009, Topics in Mechanical & Energy Engineering, Fall 2016 SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE