Faculty Profile

Richard Herrington

Title
Adjunct Faculty
Department
Information Science
College
College of Information

    

Current Scheduled Teaching*

DTSC 5502.022, Principles and Techniques for Data Science, Spring 2024

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

DTSC 5502.021, Principles and Techniques for Data Science, Fall 2023 SPOT
INFO 5502.022, Principles and Techniques for Data Science, Spring 2023 SPOT
INFO 5502.021, Principles and Techniques for Data Science, Fall 2022 SPOT
INFO 5502.003, Principles and Techniques for Data Science, Spring 2022 SPOT
INFO 5502.003, Principles and Techniques for Data Science, Fall 2021 SPOT
INFO 5900.704, Special Problems, Summer 10W 2021
INFO 5502.002, Analytic Tools, Techniques and Methods, Spring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5502.203, Analytic Tools, Techniques and Methods, Fall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5960.003, Library and Information Sciences Institute or Seminar, Spring 2020
PSYC 5710.001, Quantitative Methods II, Spring 2019 SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Publications

Published Intellectual Contributions

Journal Article
Saddrudin, S., Barnett, B., Ku, L., Havemann, D., Jucowski, S., Herrington, R., Burggren, W. W. (2020). Maternal serum concentration of anti-Müllerian hormone is a better predictor than follicle stimulating hormone of successful blastocysts development during IVF treatment.. PLOS One. 10.1371/journal.pone.0239779.
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE