UNT | University of North Texas

Main menu

Sharon Miller

Title
Assistant Professor
Department
Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology
College
College of Health and Public Service

Education

PhD, University of Minnesota, 2015.
Major: Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences
Dissertation Title: Neural correlates of phonetic learning in adult listeners with cochlear implants
MA, University of Minnesota, 2005.
Major: Audiology
Dissertation Title: Assessment of different explanations of the fundamental frequency's contribution to speech intelligibility in noise
BS, Northwestern University, 2003.
Major: Communication Sciences and Disorders

Current Scheduled Teaching*

ASLP 6690.001, Hearing Aids I, Spring 1 2019
ASLP 3030.002, Speech and Hearing Sciences, Spring 1 2019
ASLP 6770.001, Electrophysiologic Assessment, Fall 1 2018 Syllabus
ASLP 6695.001, Hearing Aids II: Strategies for Selecting and Fitting Hearing Aids, Fall 1 2018 Syllabus
ASLP 3996.003, Honors College Mentored Research Experience, Fall 1 2018

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

ASLP 6780.003, Electrophysiologic Assessment II, Spring 2018 Syllabus
ASLP 3030.002, Speech and Hearing Sciences, Spring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
ASLP 6695.001, Hearing Aids II: Strategies for Selecting and Fitting Hearing Aids, Fall 2017 Syllabus
ASLP 3030.003, Speech and Hearing Sciences, Fall 2017 Syllabus SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
1
Challenge and
Engagement Index
2
Response Rate
0
out of 5
0
out of 7
%
of
students responded
A Challenge and Engagement Index of "n/a" means
there were not enough student responses to calculate a score.
  • 1 Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • 2 Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE