Faculty Profile

Sri Skandaraja Subramanium

Title
Adjunct Faculty
Department
Chemistry
College
College of Science

    

Current Scheduled Teaching*

No current or future courses scheduled.

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

CHEM 2370.001, Organic Chemistry, Summer 8W1 2021 Syllabus SPOT
CHEM 2370.002, Organic Chemistry, Spring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
CHEM 2370.212, Organic Chemistry, Spring 2021 Syllabus
CHEM 2370.004, Organic Chemistry, Fall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
CHEM 2370.214, Organic Chemistry, Fall 2020 Syllabus
CHEM 2370.001, Organic Chemistry, Summer 8W1 2020 Syllabus SPOT
CHEM 2370.002, Organic Chemistry, Spring 2020 Syllabus
CHEM 2370.212, Organic Chemistry, Spring 2020 Syllabus
CHEM 2370.002, Organic Chemistry, Fall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
CHEM 2370.212, Organic Chemistry, Fall 2019 Syllabus
CHEM 2370.002, Organic Chemistry, Spring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
CHEM 2370.212, Organic Chemistry, Spring 2019 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Publications

Published Intellectual Contributions

Journal Article
Subramanium, S., Petrie, T. A. (2019). Appearance and Performance Enhancing Drug Usage and Psychological Well-Being in Gay and Heterosexual Men. Other. 132-148.
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE