Skip to main content

Su Yang

Title: Assistant Professor

Department: Art Foundations

College: College of Visual Arts and Design

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of Melbourne, 2019
    Major: Visual, Asian Cultural, Gender Studies
    Specialization: Visual Arts
    Dissertation: REFRAMING THE REPRESENTATION OF WOMEN IN CONTEMPORARY CHINA WITH FEMINISM
  • MFA, State University of New York at Buffalo, 2014
    Major: Painting
    Specialization: Fine Arts
    Dissertation: Feminist Paintings of Cosmetic Surgery
  • BA, Tsinghua University, 2010
    Major: Arts and Crafts
    Specialization: Design

Current Scheduled Teaching

ART 1600.401Foundations: Perception and TranslationFall 2024 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

ART 1700.001Foundations: Space (physical, temporal and virtual)Spring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1700.001Foundations: Space (physical, temporal and virtual)Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1800.001Foundations: Narrative and RepresentationSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ART 1800.105Foundations: Narrative and RepresentationFall 2022 SPOT
ART 1800.106Foundations: Narrative and RepresentationFall 2022 SPOT

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Research

  • Yang, S., "College of Visual Arts and Design Flagship Grant," sponsored by College of Visual Arts and Design, University of North Texas, $5199.2 Funded. (2023).
  • Yang, S. (Principal), "Community Grants Arts Small Project Funding," sponsored by City of Yarra Council, Regional, $1000 Funded. (2021 - 2021).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE