Faculty Profile

Trina Harlow

Title
Lecturer
Department
Art Education
College
College of Visual Arts and Design

    

Education

PhD, Kansas State University, 2019.
Major: Curriculum & Instruction
MAE, Boston University, 2012.
Major: Art Education
BS, Kansas State University, 1984.
Major: Fashion Design
Certificate, Paris Fashion Institute, 1984.
Major: Fashion Design

Current Scheduled Teaching*

EDEE 4101.760, Clinical Teaching, Spring 2024
ARTE 5775.001, Feminist Perspectives on Art, Research, and Teaching, Spring 2024 Syllabus
ART 4900.761, Special Problems, Spring 2024
EDEE 5101.754, Student Teaching in EC through Grade 6, Spring 2024
EDCI 5108.757, Student Teaching in the Secondary Schools, Spring 2024
EDCI 4138.753, Student Teaching Secondary School Art, Spring 2024

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

ARTE 4750.001, Art Education: Elementary Art Education Practices, Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ARTE 4780.001, Art Education: Secondary Art Education Practices, Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDEE 4101.762, Clinical Teaching, Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4138.752, Student Teaching Secondary School Art, Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ARTE 5750.002, Theory and Practice of Teaching Elementary and Secondary Art, Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ARTE 5774.001, Visual Culture Theories & Pedagogy, Spring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ARTE 5772.001, Critical Art Education, Fall 2022 SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE