Skip to main content

Cornelius Q. Anderson

Title: Assistant Professor of Practice

Department: Teacher Education and Administration

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MEd, American College of Education, 2011
    Major: Educational Leadership

Current Scheduled Teaching

EDCI 4070.001Teaching Diverse PopulationsSpring 2025
EDEE 1010.003Teaching as Advocacy for EquityFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

EDEE 1010.004Teaching as Advocacy for EquitySpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDEE 1010.004Teaching as Advocacy for EquityFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDLE 2010.003How Schools WorkSpring 8W2 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4070.002Teaching Diverse PopulationsSpring 2021 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 4070.001Teaching Diverse PopulationsFall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Edwards, W., Anderson, C.Q. (2023). Teacher-principal ethnoracial matching, geography, and novice teacher career outcomes. AERA Open.

    • Research Report

  • Edwards, W.L., Anderson, C. (2023). Policy Brief: Teacher-Principal Ethnoracial Matching, Geography, and New Teacher Career Outcomes.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE