Skip to main content

DeLaFuente Z. DeLaFuente

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Philosophy and Religion

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

  • Environmental Education, Science & Technology Building 372A
  • czd0001@unt.edu

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MA, Texas A&M University, 2013
    Major: Philosophy
  • BA, University of North Texas, 2007
    Major: Philosophy

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

PHIL 2500.005Introduction to Contemporary Environmental IssuesSpring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.012Introduction to PhilosophyFall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1800.004Philosophy of SelfSpring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1800.005Philosophy of SelfSpring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1800.005Philosophy of SelfFall 2016 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1800.006Philosophy of SelfFall 2016 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.007Introduction to PhilosophySpring 2016 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.008Introduction to PhilosophySpring 2016 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1400.005Contemporary Moral IssuesFall 2015 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1800.006Philosophy of SelfSpring 2015 Syllabus
PHIL 1800.008Philosophy of SelfSpring 2015 Syllabus
PHIL 1800.001Philosophy of SelfSummer 5W2 2014 Syllabus
PHIL 2050.201Introduction to LogicFall 2013
PHIL 2050.203Introduction to LogicFall 2013
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE