Skip to main content

Deborah Caldwell

Title: Assistant Librarian

Department: Library - PS - Library Research Support Services

College: University of North Texas

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of North Texas, 2018
    Major: Information Science
  • Certificate, Seoul National University, 2011
    Major: Korean Language
  • BA, University of Colorado at Boulder, 2009
    Major: Anthropology

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

No previous courses scheduled.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Bignoli, C., Buechler, S., Caldwell, D., McElroy, K. (2021). Resisting Crisis Surveillance Capitalism in Academic Libraries. Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship. https://doi.org/10.33137/cjalrcbu.v7.36450
  • Other

  • Wong, D., Chiu, A., Dai, J., Caldwell, D.Y., Roh, C. (2021). Letter to Asian Diasporic Library Workers.
  • White Paper

  • Halbert, M., Skinner, K., Sittel, R., Caldwell, D., Concannon, M., Jacobs, J.R., Laster, S., Matheson, S. (2019). Toward a Shared Agenda: Report on Preservation of Electronic Government Information (PEGI Project) Activities for 2017-2019.
  • Sittel, R., Halbert, M., Skinner, K., Caldwell, D., Concannon, M., Jacobs, J.R., Laster, S., Matheson, S. (2019). PEGI Project National Forum Summary and Report. Other. 30. Atlanta, GA, Educopia Institute. https://educopia.org/pegi/

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

    Grant - Service

  • Caldwell, D. (Co-Principal), Rood, M. (Co-Principal), Patterson, O. (Co-Principal), "Anti-Racist Resources Library," sponsored by UNCG Libraries Dean's Innovation and Program Enrichment Grant, Other, $3000 Funded. (2020 - 2021).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE