Faculty Profile

David Ragan

Title
Adjunct Faculty
Department
Finance, Insurance, Real Estate and Law
College
College of Business
Adjunct Faculty
Finance, Insurance, Real Estate and Law
College of Business

    

Education

BBA, University of North Texas, 2003.
Major: Finance

Current Scheduled Teaching*

FIPL 4610.001, Financial Planning Capstone, Spring 2024 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

FIPL 4610.001, Financial Planning Capstone, Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 4610.001, Financial Planning Capstone, Spring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 4610.001, Financial Planning Capstone, Fall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 4610.001, Comprehensive Financial Planning, Spring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 4610.001, Comprehensive Financial Planning, Fall 2020 Syllabus SPOT
FINA 2770.001, Personal Finance, Spring 2014
FINA 4610.001, Comprehensive Financial Planning, Fall 2013
FINA 2770.001, Personal Finance, Spring 2013
FINA 2770.001, Personal Finance, Fall 2012
FINA 2770.001, Personal Finance, Spring 2012
FINA 2770.001, Personal Finance, Fall 2011
FINA 2770.001, Personal Finance, Spring 2011
FINA 2770.001, Personal Finance, Fall 2010

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Publications

Published Intellectual Contributions

Book
Ragan, D. (2017). The Wealth Builder Challenge. 154. Denton, Texas: Grunden Financial Advisory, Inc..
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE