Skip to main content

Evan Powers

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Music Education

College: College of Music

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MME, Florida State University, 2023
    Major: Music Education
  • BMEd, Florida State University, 2010
    Major: Choral Music Education

Current Scheduled Teaching

MUED 2310.003Introduction to Music EducationFall 2025 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

MUED 2310.003Introduction to Music EducationSpring 2025 Syllabus SPOT
MUED 2310.003Introduction to Music EducationFall 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDME 4103.777Student Teaching in Grades 4 8Spring 2024 SPOT
EDME 4103.777Student Teaching in Grades 4 8Fall 2023 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Powers, E. (2025). Empathy Development in Music Education: A Review of Literature. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/87551233251346158
  • Taylor, D., Nápoles, J., Powers, E. (2025). Divisive Concepts Laws: The Experiences of Queer Male Choir Teachers of Color in Florida and Texas. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education. (244) 8-26. University of Illinois Press. https://doi.org/10.5406/21627223.244.01
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE