Skip to main content

Francesca Cape

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Linguistics

College: College of Information

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of North Texas, 2022
    Major: Interdisciplinary Studies - Computational Linguistics
  • BA, University of North Texas, 2018
    Major: English - Creative Writing
  • BA, University of North Texas, 2018
    Major: Linguistics

Current Scheduled Teaching

LING 2050.006The Language of Now : Pop Culture, Technology, and SocietySpring 2025
LING 4135.001Python Programming for TextFall 2024 Syllabus
LING 2050.004The Language of Now : Pop Culture, Technology, and SocietyFall 2024 Syllabus
LING 2050.005The Language of Now : Pop Culture, Technology, and SocietyFall 2024 Syllabus
LING 3040.001The Politics of LanguageFall 2024 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

LING 4950.002Senior Capstone Field Experience and MethodsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
LING 2050.003The Language of Now : Pop Culture, Technology, and SocietySpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
LING 2050.003The Language of Now : Pop Culture, Technology, and SocietyFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
LING 2050.004The Language of Now : Pop Culture, Technology, and SocietyFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
LING 3040.001The Politics of LanguageFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
LING 4950.001Senior Capstone Field ExperienceSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
LING 2050.003The Language of Now : Pop Culture, Technology, and SocietySpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
LING 2050.003The Language of Now : Pop Culture, Technology, and SocietyFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
LING 3040.001The Politics of LanguageFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE