Skip to main content

Ijay Kaz-Onyeakazi

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Information Science

College: College of Information

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, Texas A&M University-Commerce, 2017
    Major: Computational Sciences

Current Scheduled Teaching

DTSC 4501.501Principles of Data Science and AnalyticsSpring 2025
INFO 4670.402Data Analysis and Knowledge DiscoveryFall 2024 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

DTSC 4501.001Principles of Data Science and AnalyticsSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 4670.002Data Analysis and Knowledge DiscoveryFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
INFO 5717.001Networked Data Modeling and ProcessingFall 2023 SPOT
INFO 5717.001Networked Data Modeling and ProcessingSpring 2023 SPOT
INFO 5810.003Data Analysis and Knowledge DiscoveryFall 2022 SPOT

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Conference Proceeding

  • Zeleke, M., Hong, L., Kaz-Onyeakazi, I., Smith, D.L., Milburn, S., Esener, Y. (2023). #NoMore: An Analysis of Topics and Sentiments Indicative of the War in Ethiopia. iSchools/ iConference 2023 Proceedings. https://hdl.handle.net/2142/117377
  • Poster

  • Smith, D.L., Wood, T.L., Zhang, X., Kaz-Onyeakazi, I. (2022). Building the Capacity of School Librarians to Facilitate the Success of English Language Learners. Proceedings of the Association for Library and Information Science Education Annual Conference. 2. Westford, MA, Association for Library and Information Science Education (ALISE). https://iopn.library.illinois.edu/journals/aliseacp/article/view/1100
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE