Skip to main content

Kelly A. McFarland

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Anthropology

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, University of North Texas, 2019
    Major: Applied Anthropology
    Dissertation: Twenty-First Century Local Food Farmers in North Texas: An Evaluation of Farming Methods, Best Practices, and Common Struggles
  • BA, University of North Texas, 2016
    Major: Anthropology

Current Scheduled Teaching

ANTH 3101.501Issues in Contemporary American Culture and SocietySpring 2025
AMDS 4900.501Special ProblemsSpring 2025
BAAS 4100.700Managing a 21st Century CareerFall 8W2 2024 Syllabus

Previous Scheduled Teaching

BAAS 3000.702Pathways to Civic EngagementSummer 8W1 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BAAS 3000.702Pathways to Civic EngagementSpring 8W2 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BAAS 3000.703Pathways to Civic EngagementSpring 8W2 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BAAS 3000.901Pathways to Civic EngagementSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
BAAS 3020.702Fundamentals of Inquiry and DiscoveryFall 8W1 2023 Syllabus SPOT
BAAS 3000.703Pathways to Civic EngagementFall 8W2 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ANTH 3101.501American Culture and SocietySpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ANTH 3101.520American Culture and SocietySpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
ANTH 2300.510Culture and SocietySpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
SPDA 3031.521Applied Design ResearchFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
SPDA 3031.531Applied Design ResearchFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ANTH 1010.100Introduction to AnthropologySpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ANTH 1010.200Introduction to AnthropologySpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
ANTH 4701.047Topics in Sociocultural AnthropologyFall 2021 Syllabus SPOT
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE