Skip to main content

Keith W. Brown

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Philosophy and Religion

College: College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MA, University of North Texas, 2016
    Major: Philosophy
  • BA, University of North Texas, 2013
    Major: Philosophy

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

PHIL 3310.001Ancient Greek PhilosophyFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 3120.001Social and Political PhilosophyFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.002Introduction to PhilosophySummer 5W2 2022 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1400.002Ethics and SocietySpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 4200.001Science, Technology, and SocietySummer 5W1 2020 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.005Introduction to PhilosophySpring 2020 Syllabus
PHIL 1050.006Introduction to PhilosophySpring 2020 Syllabus
PHIL 1050.008Introduction to PhilosophyFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.009Introduction to PhilosophyFall 2019 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1400.003Contemporary Moral IssuesSpring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1400.004Contemporary Moral IssuesSpring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1400.005Contemporary Moral IssuesFall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1400.006Contemporary Moral IssuesFall 2018 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 3310.001Ancient PhilosophySummer 5W1 2018 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.006Introduction to PhilosophySpring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.009Introduction to PhilosophySpring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.005Introduction to PhilosophyFall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.006Introduction to PhilosophyFall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 4500.001ExistentialismSummer 5W2 2017 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.002Introduction to PhilosophySpring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.005Introduction to PhilosophySpring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.006Introduction to PhilosophyFall 2016 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 1050.007Introduction to PhilosophyFall 2016 Syllabus SPOT
PHIL 2070.001Great ReligionsSummer 5W2 2016 Syllabus
PHIL 2050.201Introduction to LogicFall 2015 SPOT
PHIL 2050.204Introduction to LogicFall 2015 SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Book Chapter

  • Brown, K.W. (2014). Anarchism. Encyclopedia of ETHICS, SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND ENGINEERING, 2ND EDITION. 1 67–69. Engage.

    • Journal Article

  • Holbrook, J.B., Barr, K., Brown, K.W. (2013). Research impact: We need negative metrics too. Nature. 497 (7450) 439–439. Nature Publishing Group.
  • Callicott, J., Parker, J., Batson, J.S., Bell, N.M., Brown, K.W., Moss, S. (2011). The Other in A Sand County Almanac. Environmental Ethics. 33 (2) 115–146.
  • Brown, K.W., Cavazos, R. (2005). Why is this show so dumb? Advertising revenue and program content of network television. Review of Industrial Organization. 27 17--34. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    • Textbook

  • Callicott, J., Callicott, van Buren, J. (2018). Greek Natural Philosophy: The Presocratics and their importance for environmental philosophy. 384. San Diego, CA, COGNELLA. https://titles.cognella.com/humanities-and-fine-arts/philosophy/greek-natural-philosophy-9781516528561.html
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE