Skip to main content

Lisa Redding

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Teacher Education and Administration

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

EDRE 4850.003Teaching the Tools and Practices of Reading Across the CurriculumSpring 2026 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

EDEE 1010.003Introduction To TeachingFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
EDRE 4850.014Teaching the Tools and Practices of Reading Across the CurriculumSpring 2025
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Redding, L. (2026). Book Review: Critical Disciplinary Literacy: An Equity‐Driven and Culturally Responsive Approach to Learning and Teaching. Other. 69 (4) Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.70027
  • Murdter-Atkinson, J.A., Ranschaert, R., Ashcraft, E., Redding, L. (2025). “We Can't Use That Book!”: Navigating Preservice Teacher's Text Selection Under the Specter of Censorship Discourses. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice. 74 (1) 191-211. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/23813377251358197
  • Murdter-Atkinson, J., Ranschaert, R., Ashcraft, C., Redding, L. (2025). “We can't use that book!”: Navigating preservice teacher's text selection under the specter of censorship discourses. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/23813377251358197
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE