Skip to main content

Margaret L. Norris

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Teacher Education and Administration

College: College of Education

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2021
    Major: Curriculum and Instruction
    Specialization: Curriculum Studies
  • MEd, University of North Texas, 2014
    Major: Educational Leadership
  • MEd, University of North Texas, 2009
    Major: Reading
  • BA, University of North Texas, 2005
    Major: Literature

Current Scheduled Teaching

EDEE 4890.007Practice Based ResearchFall 2024 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

EDEE 4890.005Practice Based ResearchSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDCI 3830.003Teaching/Learning Process and EvaluationSpring 2024 Syllabus SPOT
EDEE 4890.013Practice Based ResearchFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDEE 4890.002Practice Based ResearchSpring 2023 Syllabus SPOT
EDEE 4890.013Practice Based ResearchFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
EDEE 4890.019Practice Based ResearchFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
EDLE 2010.501How Schools WorkSpring 8W2 2022 SPOT
EDLE 2010.502How Schools WorkSpring 8W1 2022 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE