Skip to main content

Olajumoke Ayeni

Title: Teaching Fellow

Department: Chemistry

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

CHEM 4620.001Advanced Inorganic ChemistrySpring 2026 Syllabus SPOT
CHEM 4620.303Advanced Inorganic ChemistrySpring 2026 SPOT
CHEM 4620.304Advanced Inorganic ChemistrySpring 2026 SPOT
CHEM 1410.005General Chemistry I for Science MajorsFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
CHEM 1410.205General Chemistry I for Science MajorsFall 2025
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Yasmeen, R., Islam, S.M., Ayeni, O., Moghadam, P.Z., Du, J., A Omary, M. (2025). Effects of de-fluorination on hydrophobicity and on CO 2 and CH 4 adsorption under high humidity in MeMOFs, methylated analogues of FMOFs. Dalton Transactions. 54 (19) 7641-7658. Royal Society of Chemistry.
  • Yasmeen, R., Islam, S.M., Ayeni, O., Moghadam, P.Z., Du, J., Omary, M.A. (2025). Effects of de-fluorination on hydrophobicity and on CO2 and CH4 adsorption under high humidity in MeMOFs, methylated analogues of FMOFs. Dalton Transactions. 54 (19) 7641-7658. https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/105003107217
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE