Skip to main content

Samson D. Lepcha

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Learning Technologies

College: College of Information

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2019
    Major: Learning Technologies - LT PhD Residential
  • MA, University of Colorado, 2014
    Major: Learning Technologies
  • BA, Metropolitan State University, 2006
    Major: Business Psychology

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

LTEC 5702.020Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Learning AnalyticsFall 2023 SPOT
LTEC 2600.501Digital Tools in EducationFall 8W2 2023 Syllabus SPOT
LTEC 3260.020Web AuthoringFall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
LTEC 5420.020Web AuthoringFall 2023 SPOT
LTEC 2600.501Digital Tools in EducationSpring 8W2 2023 Syllabus SPOT
LTEC 2600.501Digital Tools in EducationFall 8W2 2022 Syllabus SPOT
LTEC 2600.501Digital Tools in EducationSpring 8W1 2022 Syllabus SPOT
LTEC 2600.501Digital Tools in EducationFall 8W2 2021 SPOT
LTEC 2600.502Digital Tools in EducationFall 8W1 2021 Syllabus SPOT
LTEC 5260.020Computer Graphics for Mediated CommunicationsSpring 2017 SPOT
LTEC 3220.020Computer Graphics in Education and TrainingSpring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
LTEC 3220.020Computer Graphics in Education and TrainingFall 2016 Syllabus SPOT
LTEC 3220.020Computer Graphics in Education and TrainingSummer 10W 2016 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Conference Proceeding

  • Christensen, R., Knezek, G., Darby, D., Den Lepcha, S., Jiang, B., Kuo, A., Wu, A., Johnston, J. (2017). Outcomes from Technology Enhanced Informal Learning Activities: Total Solar Eclipse. Other. Proceedings of EdMedia 2017 (pp. 1064-1071). Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/178499/
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE