Skip to main content

Thomas Kiselak

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Chemistry

College: College of Science

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • PhD, University of North Texas, 2020
    Major: Chemistry
    Specialization: Analytical Chemistry
    Dissertation: Mass Spectrometry Guided Development of a Controlled Release Nanotransfersome Transdermal Drug Delivery System

Current Scheduled Teaching

CHEM 3451.001Quantitative AnalysisSpring 2026 Syllabus
CHEM 3452.301Quantitative Analysis LaboratorySpring 2026 Syllabus
CHEM 3452.302Quantitative Analysis LaboratorySpring 2026 Syllabus
CHEM 3452.303Quantitative Analysis LaboratorySpring 2026 Syllabus
CHEM 3452.304Quantitative Analysis LaboratorySpring 2026 Syllabus
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

CHEM 1410.008General Chemistry I for Science MajorsFall 2025 Syllabus SPOT
CHEM 1410.208General Chemistry I for Science MajorsFall 2025
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE