Faculty Profile

Thom DeWitt

Title
Clinical Associate Professor
Department
Multidisciplinary Innovation
College
College of Applied and Collaborative Studies

    

Education

PhD, State University of New York at Binghamton, 1996.
Major: Biological Sciences

Current Scheduled Teaching*

BIOL 1132.581, Environmental Science, Spring 2024 Syllabus
BIOL 1132.585, Environmental Science, Spring 2024 Syllabus
BIOL 1132.591, Environmental Science, Spring 2024 Syllabus
BIOL 1132.595, Environmental Science, Spring 2024 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

BIOL 1132.520, Environmental Science, Fall 2023 Syllabus SPOT
BIOL 1132.521, Environmental Science, Fall 2023 SPOT
BIOL 1132.581, Environmental Science, Spring SDC 2023 Syllabus SPOT
BIOL 1132.585, Environmental Science, Spring SDC 2023 Syllabus SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Publications

Published Intellectual Contributions

Journal Article
Blanchard, R. C., DeWitt, T. J., Young, S., Perkin, J. S. (2024). Predictability and conceptual repeatability of the predator-associated burst speed ecophenotype in western mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis). Journal of Fish Biology. 2024(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.15665
Bernal, J. S., Helms, A. M., Fontes-Puebla, A. A., DeWitt, T. J., Kolomeits, M. V., Grunseich, J. M. (2023). Root volatile profles and herbivore preference are mediated by maize domestication, geographic spread, and modern breeding. Planta. 257, 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-022-04057-0
DeWitt, T. J. (2022). A simplified perspective on the index of spatial autocorrelation. Landscape Ecology.
DeWitt, T. J., Troendle, N. J., Mateos, M., Mauricio, R. (2021). Population genetics and independently replicated evolution of predator-associated burst speed ecophenotypy in mosquitofish. 128, 45–55.
Mays, J. R., DeWitt, T. J., Dharampal, P., Andrus, C. T., Findlay, R. H. (2021). Frequent habitat migration, phenotypic plasticity, and residual ecophenotypy reveal. 20, 639–656.
DeWitt, T., Fuentes, J. I., Thomas, I. R., Bishop, M. P. (2021). Rectifying I: three point and continuous fit of the spatial autocorrelation metric, Moran’s I, to ideal form. Landscape Ecology.
DeWitt, T. J. (2016). Expanding the phenotypic plasticity paradigm to broader views of trait space and ecological function. 62, 463-473.
Ruehl, C. B., Shervette, V., DeWitt, T. J. (2011). Replicated shape variation between simple and complex habitats in two estuarine fishes. 103, 147–158.
Tobler, M., DeWitt, T. J., Schlupp, I., García de León, F. J., Herrmann, R., Feulner, P. G., Tiedemann, R., Plath, M. (2008). Toxic hydrogen sulfide and dark caves: Phenotypic and genetic divergence across two abiotic environmental gradients in Poecilia mexicana. 62, 2643–2659.
Johnson, J. B., DeWitt, T. J., Burt, D. B. (2008). Form, function, and fitness: pathways to survival. 62, 1243-1251.

Awarded Grants

Contracts, Grants and Sponsored Research

Grant - Research
DeWitt, T. J., "Geospatial analysis of multivariate population genetic data," Sponsored by UNT New College, Local, $2500 Funded. (April 11, 2023June 25, 2024).
DeWitt, T. J., "Environmental surveying tools and curricula," Sponsored by UNT New College, Local, $1198 Funded. (April 11, 2023December 15, 2023).
DeWitt, T. J., "Phenotypic plasticity and off-plane phenotypy induced in mosquitofish by functionally distinct predators," Sponsored by UNT New College, Local, $2467 Funded. (January 19, 2023June 25, 2023).
,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE