Faculty Profile
Terrence Suber
Title
Senior Lecturer
Department
Marketing
College
College of Business
-
Business Leadership Building358 E
- Terrence.Suber@unt.edu
- (940) 565-3091
Curriculum Vitae
Education
Current Scheduled Teaching*
MKTG 4805.750, Internship in Professional Selling, Summer 2024
MKTG 4805.700, Internship in Professional Selling, Spring 2024
MKTG 3881.001, Personal Professional Development, Spring 2024 Syllabus
MKTG 3010.002, Professional Selling, Spring 2024 Syllabus
MKTG 4770.001, Sales Force Design and Management, Spring 2024 Syllabus
* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
Previous Scheduled Teaching*
MKTG 4805.001, Internship in Professional Selling, Fall 2023
MKTG 3881.501, Personal Professional Development, Fall 2020 SPOT
MKTG 3881.001, Personal Professional Development, Spring 2020 Syllabus
MKTG 3010.002, Professional Selling, Spring 2020 Syllabus
MKTG 3010.070, Professional Selling, Spring 2020 Syllabus
MKTG 4770.001, Sales Force Design and Management, Spring 2020 Syllabus
MKTG 4900.700, Special Problems, Summer 10W 2019
MKTG 3010.002, Professional Selling, Spring 2015 Syllabus
MKTG 3010.003, Professional Selling, Spring 2015 Syllabus
MKTG 4770.001, Sales Force Design and Management, Spring 2015
* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.
| Overall Summative Rating |
Challenge and Engagement Index |
Response Rate |
|---|---|---|
out of 5 |
out of 7 |
% of students responded |
- Overall Summative Rating (median):
This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):- The course as a whole was
- The course content was
- The instructor’s contribution to the course was
- The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
- Challenge and Engagement Index:
This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):- Do you expect your grade in this course to be
- The intellectual challenge presented was
- The amount of effort you put into this course was
- The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
- Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was