Skip to main content

Xiaolong Shao

Title: Adjunct Faculty

Department: Hospitality, Event and Tourism Management

College: College of Merchandising, Hospitality and Tourism

Curriculum Vitae

Curriculum Vitae Link

Education

  • MS, Iowa State University, 2017
    Major: Hospitality Management
    Dissertation: The Role of Perceived Control and Redress Propensity on Propensity to Complain
  • BS, Iowa State University, 2013
    Major: Environmental Science

Current Scheduled Teaching

No current or future courses scheduled.

Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching

HMGT 1500.001Orientation to the Hospitality IndustrySpring 2023 SPOT
HMGT 1500.002Orientation to the Hospitality IndustryFall 2022 Syllabus SPOT
EDEM 3240.001Convention and Event ManagementSpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
HMGT 1500.001Orientation to the Hospitality IndustrySpring 2022 Syllabus SPOT
Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Published Intellectual Contributions

    Journal Article

  • Zhang, X., Jeong, E., Shao, X., Olson, E. (2022). The effects of product transformation salience (PTS) on festival visitors' recycling intentions: Do gender and age matter?. Journal of Convention & Event Tourism. Denton, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epub/10.1080/15470148.2022.2050331?needAccess=true
,
Overall
Summative Rating		 Challenge and
Engagement Index		 Response Rate

out of 5
out of 7		 %
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE