UNT | University of North Texas

Main menu

Han Wen

Title
Assistant Professor
Department
Hospitality and Tourism Management
College
College of Merchandising, Hospitality and Tourism

Education

PhD, Kansas State University, 2015.
Major: Hospitality Administration
MS, University of Houston, 2012.
Major: Hotel and Restaurant Management
BS, Sun Yat-sen University, 2010.
Major: Tourism Management

Current Scheduled Teaching*

HMGT 5280.002, Hotel and Restaurant Operations, Spring 1 2019
HMGT 4300.003, Survey of Beverages in the Hospitality Industry, Spring 1 2019
HMGT 5200.001, Survey of Beverages in the Hospitality Industry, Spring 1 2019
HMGT 5820.001, Facilities Planning, Equipment Layout and Design, Fall 1 2018 Syllabus
HMGT 5820.601, Facilities Planning, Equipment Layout and Design, Fall 1 2018 Syllabus
HMGT 4820.001, Facilities Planning, Equipment, Layout and Design, Fall 1 2018 Syllabus
HMGT 5920.011, Problem in Lieu of Thesis, Fall 1 2018
HMGT 4300.002, Survey of Beverages in the Hospitality Industry, Fall 1 2018 Syllabus
HMGT 5200.001, Survey of Beverages in the Hospitality Industry, Fall 1 2018 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

HMGT 5790.003, Field Experience in Hospitality and Tourism, Summer 10W 2018 Syllabus
HMGT 5280.002, Hotel and Restaurant Operations, Spring 2018 Syllabus
HMGT 4300.003, Survey of Beverages in the Hospitality Industry, Spring 2018 Syllabus SPOT
HMGT 5200.001, Survey of Beverages in the Hospitality Industry, Spring 2018 Syllabus
HMGT 5820.001, Facilities Planning, Equipment Layout and Design, Fall 2017 Syllabus
HMGT 4820.001, Facilities Planning, Equipment, Layout and Design, Fall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
HMGT 5950.011, Master's Thesis, Fall 2017
HMGT 4300.002, Survey of Beverages in the Hospitality Industry, Fall 2017 Syllabus SPOT
HMGT 5200.001, Survey of Beverages in the Hospitality Industry, Fall 2017 Syllabus
HMGT 4300.003, Survey of Beverages in the Hospitality Industry, Spring 2017 Syllabus SPOT
HMGT 5200.001, Survey of Beverages in the Hospitality Industry, Spring 2017 Syllabus
HMGT 5820.001, Facilities Planning, Equipment Layout and Design, Fall 2016 Syllabus
HMGT 4820.002, Facilities Planning, Equipment, Layout and Design, Fall 2016 Syllabus SPOT
HMGT 4300.002, Survey of Beverages in the Hospitality Industry, Fall 2016 Syllabus SPOT
HMGT 5200.001, Survey of Beverages in the Hospitality Industry, Fall 2016 Syllabus

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
1
Challenge and
Engagement Index
2
Response Rate
0
out of 5
0
out of 7
%
of
students responded
A Challenge and Engagement Index of "n/a" means
there were not enough student responses to calculate a score.
  • 1 Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • 2 Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE