Faculty Profile

Sam Bergmann

Title
Assistant Professor
Department
Behavior Analysis
College
College of Health and Public Service

    

Education

PhD, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2018.
Major: Psychology
Degree Specialization: Behavior Analysis
Dissertation Title: Establishing Quality Standards for Applied Behavior Analytic Skill-Acquisition Interventions: A Translational Model with Undergraduate Students
MA, Western Michigan University, 2013.
Major: Behavior Analysis
BA, University of Minnesota, 2011.
Major: Psychology/Spanish Studies

Current Scheduled Teaching*

BEHV 3550.001, Behavior Change Techniques, Fall 1 2019 Syllabus
BEHV 5820.703, Internship, Fall 1 2019
BEHV 5100.001, Introduction to Behavior Analysis, Fall 1 2019 Syllabus
BEHV 5950.703, Master's Thesis, Fall 1 2019

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

Previous Scheduled Teaching*

BEHV 5810.703, Practicum, Summer 5W2 2019
BEHV 5815.703, Practicum, Summer 5W1 2019
BEHV 5010.002, Experimental Analysis of Behavior, Spring 2019 Syllabus SPOT
BEHV 5820.703, Internship, Spring 2019
BEHV 5950.703, Master's Thesis, Spring 2019
BEHV 5815.703, Practicum, Spring 2019
BEHV 5100.001, Introduction to Behavior Analysis, Fall 2018 Syllabus SPOT

* Texas Education Code 51.974 (HB 2504) requires each institution of higher education to make available to the public, a syllabus for undergraduate lecture courses offered for credit by the institution.

,
Overall
Summative Rating
Challenge and
Engagement Index
Response Rate

out of 5

out of 7
%
of
students responded
  • Overall Summative Rating (median):
    This rating represents the combined responses of students to the four global summative items and is presented to provide an overall index of the class’s quality. Overall summative statements include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 5 = Excellent, 3 = Good, and 1= Very poor):
    • The course as a whole was
    • The course content was
    • The instructor’s contribution to the course was
    • The instructor’s effectiveness in teaching the subject matter was
  • Challenge and Engagement Index:
    This rating combines student responses to several SPOT items relating to how academically challenging students found the course to be and how engaged they were. Challenge and Engagement Index items include the following (response options include a Likert scale ranging from 7 = Much higher, 4 = Average, and 1 = Much lower):
    • Do you expect your grade in this course to be
    • The intellectual challenge presented was
    • The amount of effort you put into this course was
    • The amount of effort to succeed in this course was
    • Your involvement in course (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) was
CLOSE